net neutrality
kinda important, so pay attention.
new york times editorial: "Cable and telephone companies that provide Internet service are talking about creating a two-tiered Internet, in which Web sites that pay them large fees would get priority over everything else.
But this democratic Internet would be in danger if the companies that deliver Internet service changed the rules so that Web sites that pay them money would be easily accessible, while little-guy sites would be harder to access, and slower to navigate. Providers could also block access to sites they do not like.
The House Energy and Commerce Committee defeated a good Net-neutrality amendment last week. But the amendment got more votes than many people expected, suggesting that support for Net neutrality is beginning to take hold in Congress. In the Senate, Olympia Snowe, a Maine Republican, and Byron Dorgan, a North Dakota Democrat, are drafting a strong Net-neutrality bill that would prohibit broadband providers from creating a two-tiered Internet. Senators who care about the Internet and Internet users should get behind it."
imperative if we wan't to maintain internet equality.

3 comments:
MEK wrote something on his blog about it, but I didn't quite understand what it was all about. This is really creepy. It's like the worst high-school popularity contest coming to life for adults. After all, weren't those just based on who had the most money?
Or was that every political election? I forget, and digress.
so, according to your metaphor, i'd still be the one getting beaned by a stapler or random piece of chalk?
Yes, sir! (giggle)
Post a Comment